FTC Proposes Ban on Non-Compete Clauses for Workers

The Federal Commerce Fee (FTC) proposed a ban on noncompete clauses that prohibit employees from leaving for higher jobs at rival corporations firms, saying that eliminating curbs that have an effect on one in 5 American employees will improve wages by at the least $250 billion a yr.

Key Takeaways

  • The U.S. Federal Commerce Fee has proposed a ban on noncompete clauses in employment.
  • The clauses unfairly hinder competitors and value U.S. employees at the least $250 billion yearly in lowered pay, the FTC stated.
  • The proposed rule is topic to 60 days of public remark and might be revised earlier than adoption.
  • The lone Republican commissioner voted towards the proposal and warned it might not survive authorized challenges.

“The liberty to vary jobs is core to financial liberty and to a aggressive, thriving financial system,” stated FTC Chair Lina Khan. “Noncompetes block employees from freely switching jobs, depriving them of upper wages and higher working situations, and depriving companies of a expertise pool that they should construct and develop. By ending this apply, the FTC’s proposed rule would promote larger dynamism, innovation, and wholesome competitors.”

The FTC voted 3-1 to suggest the rule, with the fee’s lone Republican objecting. The proposed ban exceeds the fee’s authority and “will result in protracted litigation during which the fee is unlikely to prevail,” Commissioner Christine Wilson wrote in her dissent.

The motion follows a current coverage change signaling the fee’s intent to aggressively goal anti-competitive practices, and a 2021 govt order by President Joe Biden calling on the FTC “to curtail the unfair use” of noncompete clauses. The Biden administration has pushed for elevated protections of employee and labor union rights.

See also  Present Value of an Annuity: Meaning, Formula, and Example

The FTC’s proposed ban would finish the non-compete agreements already in impact and bar new ones, together with contract phrases serving de-facto noncompete clauses comparable to overbroad nondisclosure agreements and coaching reimbursement obligations in extra of coaching prices.

The FTC invited public touch upon the proposed rule over the subsequent two months, and famous it might amend the rule earlier than adopting it.

On Wednesday, the FTC introduced consent agreements with two glass container makers together with O-I Glass (OI) in addition to a Michigan safety firm forcing them to drop noncompete restrictions on present and former employees.

The company and foes of the noncompete clauses argue they depress wages not just for the affected employees but in addition for others not get together to such agreements, along with restraining competitors. Defenders of the clauses argue they shield employers from the lack of proprietary info and investments in coaching, and will in some circumstances correlate with increased wages.

The FTC cited the case of a safety guard who misplaced his $15-per-hour job at a Florida financial institution after a earlier employer who paid him $11 an hour invoked a two-year noncompete clause.

In one other instance utilized by the company, Amazon (AMZN) sued an govt who left to work for a tech startup, dropping the case after it attracted media protection.