HomeWorldFederal emergency brake dispute - bottlenecks in intensive care units | ...

Federal emergency brake dispute – bottlenecks in intensive care units | Free press

Berlin (dpa) – With a heated exchange of blows, the Bundestag has begun discussions on the planned nationwide Corona emergency brake. Chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU) called for haste.

“Every day earlier that the emergency brake is operated nationwide is a day gained,” Merkel said in plenary on Friday. There are already bottlenecks in intensive care units, for example in Cologne, Bremen, Berlin, Thuringia and Saxony. Patients will be flown to other regions, as the intensive care drug association DIVI announced during a hearing with Bundestag experts on the planned law.

The AfD and the left have signaled a general rejection of the federal plans. The FDP believes that national action is necessary, but still threatens a constitutional complaint because of the planned exit restrictions from 9 p.m. 25,831 new corona cases have now been reported. The number of Covid 19 patients treated in intensive care units increased by 61 to 4,740.

Merkel said, “The virus doesn’t forgive half-heartedness, it just makes everything more difficult. The virus does not forgive any hesitation, it just takes longer. The virus is non-negotiable, it understands only one language, the language of determination. The Bundestag is now feverishly negotiating the details of the planned law. A decision must be made on Wednesday. Shortly afterwards, the Bundesrat will vote. new infections per 100,000 inhabitants in one week Recently, about 350 of the more than 400 districts were above this threshold.

“The doctors in the intensive care unit are sending one call after another for help – who are we if we ignore these emergency calls?” Merkel said. The emergency brake must prevent the imminent overload of the health system. Subsequently, systematic testing could allow openings at lower incidents. In view of the spring lockdown 2020, Merkel said, “We’ve already done it once, we can do it again now.”

Despite a critical stance, FDP leader Christian Lindner said, “It is good that we are now acting uniformly across the country.” AfD group leader Alice Weidel, on the other hand, spoke of an attack on fundamental rights and freedoms. “You distrust the civilians, so you want to maneuver them during the day and lock them up at night,” Weidel said. Left party leader Dietmar Bartsch accused the government of failure. “We’ve had a permanent semi-lockdown since November, and you’re always chasing the wave.” Bartsch presented faster progress in vaccination as in the US and a national testing strategy as a solution to this. Coalition MPs backed the law.


In view of the planned exit restrictions, Lindner announced proposals to make the law “constitutional”. The FDP will go to the Federal Constitutional Court if not sued. So far, the idea has been that “a vaccinated couple (…) cannot go out alone after 9 pm for an evening walk”. Merkel defended the plans. Other states have implemented such measures “in some cases considerably more restrictively.” “The point is to reduce the number of visitors from one place to another in the evening – also with local public transport by the way.” The benefits outweigh the rest. SPD health expert Karl Lauterbach said: “It will not be enough in itself, but in no country has it been possible to regain control of a wave with variant B.1.1.7 without also using the exit restrictions tool. , and not -lock, would have used. “

Legal scientists judge the restrictions on leaving the night differently. During the hearing of the Bundestag, the lawyers had different opinions on this. According to Berlin physicist Kai Nagel, such a restriction can noticeably reduce the spread of the coronavirus. But instead of banning exits across the board at night, Nagel argued at the hearing to only ban exits for private visits indoors – around the clock. The reason for this is the much higher risk of infection inside. Rhineland-Palatinate’s state capital of Mainz suspended a curfew after the administrative court ordered the suspensive effect in an urgent procedure.


Green Group Chairman Katrin Göring-Eckardt said: “It is too late to act alone from an incidence of 200”, which is no protection for school children and no protection for parents. The intention is that schools in neighborhoods and cities with more than 200 new corona infections per week and 100,000 inhabitants will no longer offer face-to-face lessons. From an incidence of 100, there should be two corona tests per week in face-to-face classes. “We know that the mutation affects children very strongly now, that the children are infecting their parents,” said Goering-Eckardt. The Greens wanted appropriate improvements. At the same time, she criticized the fact that the law should not be launched any faster than planned.


In Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania and Baden-Württemberg, the Corona emergency brake must come into effect from Monday. In some states, stricter rules apply, which usually correspond to those of the emergency brake with a few exceptions – for example in Bavaria, Rhineland-Palatinate, Brandenburg and Schleswig-Holstein. The State Chancellors in Hesse and Saarland have not yet planned to tighten up the measures currently in force.


According to a survey, the life satisfaction of many citizens during the pandemic has improved in some areas. Many adults rate their health and sleep as significantly better, as shown by data from the “Socioeconomic Panel” with more than 6,500 respondents in April and June 2020 and January 2021. Accordingly, there are losses in leisure and family life. Philosopher Richard David Precht pointed out the manageable duration of the planned restrictions on fundamental rights: “I am not afraid that there will be an inordinate response to this or that the restrictions on fundamental rights will not be immediately reversed once we emerge from the worst of the pandemic, he said “Augsburger Allgemeine”.


Most Popular

Recent Comments